Individual Calculations August 2021
 Caunedo Alvarez, Miguel  Total change: 86.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Campeonato de Asturias Individual Tercera 2021 Tudela Agueria ESP 2021-05-29
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1223 1064 2.50 5 1.03 40 41.20 
  Fernandez Martinez, Ricardo 1280 ESP1.0010.784031.20 
  Gonzalez Balbuena, Miguel 1260 ESP0.5010.254010.00 
  Arce Cano, Lucas 1110 ESP0.001-0.4440-17.60 
  Acebal Muniz, Maria Concepcion 1172 ESP0.001-0.3540-14.00 
  Flores Picon, Juan Pedro 1294 ESP1.0010.794031.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Cto. Espana Individual Sub 16 Salobrena, Granada ESP 2021-07-19
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1396 1035 2.00 8 1.12 40 44.80 
  Larranaga Juaristi, Alexander 1435  * ESP0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Miranda Herrera, Belen 1435  * ESP0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Gomez Carreno, Laura 1413 ESP0.001-0.0940-3.60 
  Zubizarreta Landera, Denis 1435  * ESP0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Tomas Viver, Antoni 1370 ESP0.5010.384015.20 
  Gonzalez Guijas, Sergio 1435  * ESP0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Bonet Mestre, Maria 1213 ESP1.0010.734029.20 
  Saavedra Fernandez, Daniel 1435  * ESP0.5010.424016.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office