Individual Calculations January 2022
 Sanchez, Jorge Luis  Total change: -27.80  Rating chartPersonal card
 Campeonato Nacional por Equipos 2021 Panama PAN 2021-11-27
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1891 2133 3.50 4 0.40 20 8.00 
  Carrillo Marval, Maria Angelica wc1733  * PAN1.0010.08201.60 
  Chavez, Ramses 2106 PAN1.0010.46209.20 
  Carrillo, Jose Antonio 1793 PAN1.0010.12202.40 
  Oquendo, Abel c1933 PAN0.501-0.2620-5.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Campeonato SUbzonal 2.3.2 Absoluto 2021 San Salvador ESA 2021-12-04
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1859 2146 5.50 9 -1.79 20 -35.80 
  Ibarra, Carlos Roberto 1746  * ESA1.0010.08201.60 
  Lombardo, Elias 1845 PAN1.0010.15203.00 
  Baules, Jorge m2342 PAN0.001-0.2520-5.00 
  Aragon Trujillo, Ricardo M. c1857 GUA0.001-0.8420-16.80 
  Palencia, Julio 1759 GUA0.001-0.9120-18.20 
  Santos Sagastume, Paolo Andres 1746  * GUA1.0010.08201.60 
  Villalta, Camilo 1746  * ESA1.0010.08201.60 
  Pacheco, Julio 1932 ESA1.0010.23204.60 
  Pastor Carvajal, Jeigoth 1762 CRC0.501-0.4120-8.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office