Individual Calculations July 2013
 Rapport, Richard  Total change: 19.30  Rating chartPersonal card
 Sigeman & Co Chess Tournament 2013 Malmo SWE 2013-05-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2597 2674 4.50 7 0.29 10 2.90 
  Van Wely, Loek g2689 NED0.5010.02100.20 
  Short, Nigel D g2681 ENG1.0010.51105.10 
  Sokolov, Ivan g2642 NED0.501-0.0410-0.40 
  Grandelius, Nils g2556 SWE0.501-0.1610-1.60 
  Tikkanen, Hans g2537 SWE0.001-0.6810-6.80 
  Berg, Emanuel g2561 SWE1.0010.35103.50 
  Hector, Jonny g2512 SWE1.0010.29102.90 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Team 2013 - Top 12 HAGUENAU FRA 2013-05-30
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2519 2674 8.50 10 1.64 10 16.40 
  Apicella, Manuel g2532 FRA1.0010.31103.10 
  Naiditsch, Arkadij g2710 GER1.0010.55105.50 
  Roos, Jean-Luc m2274  * FRA1.0010.08100.80 
  Taddei, Benoit f2374 FRA1.0010.15101.50 
  David, Alberto g2584 ITA1.0010.38103.80 
  Kosten, Anthony C. g2479 FRA0.501-0.2510-2.50 
  Sokolov, Andrei g2563 FRA1.0010.35103.50 
  Bergez, Luc m2399 FRA1.0010.17101.70 
  Swiercz, Dariusz g2631 POL0.501-0.0610-0.60 
  Landa, Konstantin g2644 RUS0.501-0.0410-0.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office