Individual Calculations May 2014 |
|
|
Nyirkos, Peter Total change: -6.90 | | |
|
Budapest Team Ch. II. Bilek Group R 9 -10 | Budapest | HUN | 2014-03-09 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1807 | 1859 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.57 | 15 | -8.55 | |
| Karacsonyi, Gellert | | | 1807 | HUN | 0.00 | 1 | -0.57 | 15 | -8.55 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Budapest Team Ch. III. Szen Group R 9-10 | Budapest | HUN | 2014-03-09 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1935 | 1859 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.60 | 15 | 9.00 | |
| Kovacs, K. Arpad | | | 1935 | HUN | 1.00 | 1 | 0.60 | 15 | 9.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Budapest Team Ch. III. Szen Group R 11 | Budapest | HUN | 2014-04-06 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1864 | 1859 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.49 | 15 | -7.35 | |
| Bellan, Istvan | | | 1864 | HUN | 0.00 | 1 | -0.49 | 15 | -7.35 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|