Rapid: Individual Calculations December 2021
 Manojlovic, Sava  Total change: -1.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 Curug open rapid 2021 Curug SRB 2021-11-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1995 2075 4.50 9 -0.71 20 -14.20 
  Kordelos, Damir 1581 SRB1.0010.04200.80 
  Roganovic, Milos g2492 SRB0.001-0.0720-1.40 
  Ciplic, Igor 1861 SRB1.0010.23204.60 
  Mandaric, Petar 1769 SRB1.0010.14202.80 
  Abramovic, Bosko g2225 SRB0.5010.20204.00 
  Torbica, Milos 2232 SRB0.5010.21204.20 
  Todorovic, Goran N m2310 SRB0.001-0.2120-4.20 
  Kostic, Zivojin 1789 SRB0.501-0.3420-6.80 
  Aravind, P V S 1695 IND0.001-0.9120-18.20 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 MEMORIJALNI TURNIR "VLADIMIR MIHIC-ZMAJEVO 2021" Zmajevo SRB 2021-11-20
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1993 2075 6.00 9 0.65 20 13.00 
  Popovic, Rajko 1870 SRB0.501-0.2620-5.20 
  Tot, Ivan 1615 SRB0.501-0.4520-9.00 
  Cimesa, Miodrag 1952 SRB1.0010.33206.60 
  Krunic, Budimir 1957 SRB1.0010.34206.80 
  Petkovic, Radosav f2331 SRB0.001-0.1920-3.80 
  Banjac, Branimir 1970 SRB1.0010.36207.20 
  Dragovic, Momcilo f2187 SRB0.001-0.3520-7.00 
  Trifunovic, Djordje 1943 SRB1.0010.32206.40 
  Knezevic, Rodoljub 2109 SRB1.0010.552011.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office