Individual Calculations April 2014 |
|
|
Miedema, David Total change: -3.00 | | |
|
Dutch Team Competiton 13-14 - Meester - round 6 | Several | NED | 2014-03-08 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2422 | 2393 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.04 | 10 | 0.40 | |
| Van Delft, Merijn | m | | 2422 | NED | 0.50 | 1 | 0.04 | 10 | 0.40 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Oberliga NRW 2013/14 round 7 | Nordrheinwestfalen | GER | 2014-03-09 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2441 | 2393 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.43 | 10 | -4.30 | |
| Van Eijk, Sander | m | | 2441 | NED | 0.00 | 1 | -0.43 | 10 | -4.30 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | 2. Bundesliga West 2013/14 round 8 | Hamburg | GER | 2014-03-16 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2008 | 2393 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.09 | 10 | 0.90 | |
| Niekrens, Stefan | | | 2008 | GER | 1.00 | 1 | 0.09 | 10 | 0.90 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|