Individual Calculations January 2010
 Szablowski, Pawel  Total change: 13.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 South Bohemia Open 2009 Cesky Krumlov CZE 2009-11-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2116 2217 5.50 9 -0.09 15 -1.35 
  Suzuki, Yosuke 1867 JPN1.0010.11151.65 
  Karlicek, Pavel 2053 CZE1.0010.28154.20 
  Skokan, Frantisek 1909 CZE1.0010.14152.10 
  Vorobyov, Yrij f2237 UKR0.001-0.4715-7.05 
  Cilia Vincenti, David 2114 MLT0.501-0.1415-2.10 
  Kredl, Karel 2077 CZE1.0010.31154.65 
  Gorbatov, Alexey m2350 RUS0.001-0.3215-4.80 
  Loktiev, Ivan m2260 RUS1.0010.56158.40 
  Vales, Vaclav 2173 CZE0.001-0.5615-8.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Pilsen Open 2009 Plzen CZE 2009-12-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2098 2217 6.00 8 0.97 15 14.55 
  Strzelczyk, Anna 1826 POL0.001-0.9115-13.65 
  Wojcieszyn, Zdzislaw 2037 POL0.501-0.2415-3.60 
  Vojir-Sen., Vaclav 1817  * CZE1.0010.08151.20 
  Cecil, Pavel 2010 CZE1.0010.23153.45 
  Nguyen, Piotr 2353 POL1.0010.681510.20 
  Golcman, Evgeny 2290 RUS1.0010.60159.00 
  Folkova, Martina 2106 CZE1.0010.35155.25 
  Plischki, Sebastian m2347 GER0.5010.18152.70 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office