Blitz: Individual Calculations August 2015
 Nevickis, Nikolajs  Total change: -118.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 I match Karpov-Sveshnikov blitz tournament Riga LAT 2015-07-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1732 1984 3.50 8 -2.71 20 -54.20 
  Avotins, Arturs 1595 LAT1.0010.09201.80 
  Sinauridze, Simons 1765 LAT1.0010.22204.40 
  Levchenkov, Vitaly f2208 LAT0.001-0.2220-4.40 
  Litvjakova, Darija 1597 LAT1.0010.09201.80 
  Bekasovs, Rihards 1831 LAT0.001-0.7020-14.00 
  Brikers, Aleksandrs 1647 LAT0.001-0.8820-17.60 
  Horobrijs, Daniils 1597 LAT0.501-0.4120-8.20 
  Fridmans, Josifs 1614 LAT0.001-0.9020-18.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 II match Karpov-Sveshnikov blitz tournament Riga LAT 2015-07-08
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1630 1984 3.00 7 -3.21 20 -64.20 
  Litvjakova, Darija 1597 LAT1.0010.09201.80 
  Horobrijs, Daniils 1597 LAT0.501-0.4120-8.20 
  Sinauridze, Simons 1765 LAT0.001-0.7820-15.60 
  Golubovskis, Maksims 1584  * LAT0.001-0.9220-18.40 
  Zalcmane, Vija 1637 LAT0.501-0.3920-7.80 
  Golsta, Ramona 1584  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Brikers, Aleksandrs 1647 LAT0.001-0.8820-17.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office