Rapid: Individual Calculations January 2020
 Zujevs, Valerijs  Total change: 44.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Dobele Snowmen Chess Tournament 2019 Dobele LAT 2019-12-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1606 1621 5.50 7 1.99 20 39.80 
  Petrova, Anna 1221  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Kaveckas, Algirdas 1428 LTU1.0010.25205.00 
  Petersons, Ojars 1735 LAT1.0010.662013.20 
  Markevicius, Alfonsas 1762 LTU0.5010.19203.80 
  Pavlovskis, Voldemars 1632 LAT1.0010.522010.40 
  Valancius, Albertas 1815 LTU1.0010.752015.00 
  Mitenieks, Matiss 1651 LAT0.001-0.4620-9.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Riga Sports veterans club chess tournament 2019 Riga LAT 2019-12-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1664 1621 3.50 7 0.23 20 4.60 
  Visockis, Janis 2010 LAT0.5010.41208.20 
  Daudzvardis, Janis 2021  * LAT0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Andzans, Maris 1626 LAT1.0010.512010.20 
  Stivrins, Eriks 1591 LAT0.001-0.5420-10.80 
  Stavickis, Isaks 1647 LAT0.001-0.4620-9.20 
  Napins, Vadims 1372 LAT1.0010.19203.80 
  Birjukovs, Anatolijs 1384 LAT1.0010.20204.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office