Individual Calculations September 2018
 Aprups, Rinalds  Total change: 7.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 Riga Technical University Open 2018 - Tournament D Riga LAT 2018-08-09
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1480 1174 1.00 6 0.10 40 4.00 
  Agafontseva, Natalya 1574  * RUS0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Zags, Tomass 1552 LAT0.001-0.0940-3.60 
  Krastins, Arturs 1388 LAT1.0010.774030.80 
  Tihijs, Aleksejs 1488 LAT0.001-0.1440-5.60 
  Karasevics, Aleksandrs 1393 LAT0.001-0.2240-8.80 
  Zalcmane, Vija 1486 LAT0.001-0.1440-5.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 European Youth Chess Championship O-12- 2018 Riga LAT 2018-08-20
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1404 1174 2.00 8 0.08 40 3.20 
  Maghlakelidze, Lado 1574  * GEO0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Mizzi, Jack 1574  * MLT0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Rousis, Chrysostomos 1491 CYP0.001-0.1340-5.20 
  Mjatezs, Ivans 1553 LAT0.001-0.0940-3.60 
  Jonins, Dmitrijs 1292 LAT0.5010.16406.40 
  Daleckis, Deniss 1331 LAT0.001-0.2940-11.60 
  Moisio, Miska 1210 FIN0.5010.05402.00 
  Kien, Lancelot 1205 MNC1.0010.544021.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office