Rapid: Individual Calculations April 2024
 Vitums Jaunzems, Gusts  Total change: 138.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Latvian Championship Vidzeme Regional Qualifier 2024 Sigulda LAT 2024-03-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1679 1547 4.00 7 1.51 40 60.40 
  Ozolins, Kristaps 1805 LAT0.001-0.1840-7.20 
  Smilga, Olivers 1419 LAT1.0010.334013.20 
  Kalnins, Aleksandrs Alans 1723 LAT1.0010.734029.20 
  Mucenieks, Marks 1886 LAT0.001-0.1240-4.80 
  Fjodorovs, Sergejs 1401 LAT1.0010.304012.00 
  Lelis, Edgars 1947  * LAT0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Mihailovskis, Timurs 1572 LAT1.0010.534021.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Ceribu kauss of the 51st Latvian Children's and Youth Open Team Championship semifinal Riga LAT 2024-03-23
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1662 1547 4.50 7 1.95 40 78.00 
  Orlovskis, Jaroslavs 1768 LAT0.001-0.2240-8.80 
  Blinds, Gustavs 1578 LAT1.0010.544021.60 
  Mihailovskis, Timurs 1572 LAT1.0010.534021.20 
  Lahs, Edvards 1645 LAT1.0010.634025.20 
  Jahangiryan, Ruben 1561 LAT1.0010.524020.80 
  Platonovs, Nikolajs 1933 LAT0.001-0.0940-3.60 
  Lescenko, Maksims 1576 LAT0.5010.04401.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office