Individual Calculations July 2011
 Kurowski, Andrzej  Total change: 13.05  Rating chartPersonal card
 WIOSENNY OPEN 2011 w Hetmanie Warszawa POL 2011-04-04
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1917 1849 3.00 10 -1.12 15 -16.80 
  Prazmowski, Bartosz 1880 POL0.001-0.4615-6.90 
  Sujkowski, Pawel 1978 POL0.001-0.3315-4.95 
  Safanowski, Tomasz 1953 POL0.001-0.3615-5.40 
  Rafa, Robert 1957 POL1.0010.65159.75 
  Ceglowski, Ryszard 1846 POL0.001-0.5015-7.50 
  Bajkowski, Marcin 1821 POL1.0010.46156.90 
  Kedzierski, Slawomir 2102 POL0.001-0.1915-2.85 
  Liberadzki, Slawomir 2013 POL0.001-0.2815-4.20 
  Cyra, Dariusz 1860 POL0.001-0.4815-7.20 
  Kwiek, Janusz 1755 POL1.0010.37155.55 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 90th YMCA Spring 2011- B Warszawa POL 2011-04-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1894 1849 5.50 8 1.99 15 29.85 
  Rogalski, Krzysztof 1890 POL1.0010.56158.40 
  Safanowski, Tomasz 1953 POL0.5010.14152.10 
  Jarmula, Lukasz 1852 POL0.5010.00150.00 
  Moskwinski, Marek 1872 POL1.0010.53157.95 
  Rzepecka, Dorota 1900 POL1.0010.57158.55 
  Kwiatkowski, Andrzej 1843 POL0.501-0.0115-0.15 
  Kadzinski, Wieslaw 1979 POL0.5010.18152.70 
  Potocki, Karol 1860 POL0.5010.02150.30 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office