Individual Calculations November 2019
 Vaisvila, Andrius  Total change: -1.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 Taastrup Lovfald 2019 Taastrup DEN 2019-09-12
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1711 1854 3.00 5 -0.35 40 -14.00 
  Refsgaard, Kaj 1677 DEN1.0010.274010.80 
  Morling, Aase 1458 DEN1.0010.08403.20 
  Petkov, Rostislav 1798 BUL1.0010.424016.80 
  Petkov, Preslav 1794 BUL0.001-0.5840-23.20 
  Andersen, Svend Erik 1828 DEN0.001-0.5440-21.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Danish Team Ch 2019-20 Oktober Various DEN 2019-10-27
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2103 1854 0.00 1 -0.19 40 -7.60 
  Madsen, Hans-Henrik 2103 DEN0.001-0.1940-7.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 1 HK Team 2019-20 Oktober Various DEN 2019-10-28
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1862 1854 1.00 1 0.51 40 20.40 
  Kristensen, Ole Fjeldgaard 1862 DEN1.0010.514020.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office