Individual Calculations June 2022
 Parvanyan, Ashot  Total change: -11.10  Rating chartPersonal card
 Oberliga Nord-Nord 2021/2022 April 2022 various GER 2022-04-03
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2397 2455 1.00 1 0.42 10 4.20 
  Hansen, Mads m2397 DEN1.0010.42104.20 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 1. Bundesliga 2021/2022 April 2022 various GER 2022-04-09
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2423 2455 1.00 3 -0.63 10 -6.30 
  Rietze, Clemens, Dr. f2290 GER1.0010.28102.80 
  Hess, Max f2379 GER0.001-0.6010-6.00 
  Warmerdam, Max g2599 NED0.001-0.3110-3.10 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 1. Bundesliga 2021/2022 May 2022 various GER 2022-05-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2482 2455 0.50 3 -0.90 10 -9.00 
  Braun, Arik g2592 GER0.5010.18101.80 
  Feygin, Michael f2452 GER0.001-0.5010-5.00 
  Wachinger, Nikolas 2401 GER0.001-0.5810-5.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office