Individual Calculations April 2016 |
|
|
Guillaume, Romaric Total change: -41.60 | | |
|
Team 2016 - Nationale 4 Part 2 | FRANCE | FRA | 2015-12-26 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1768 | 1809 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.56 | 40 | -22.40 | |
| Mergault, Benoit | | | 1768 | FRA | 0.00 | 1 | -0.56 | 40 | -22.40 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Coupe du Leman Cat. A Geneve 2016 | different places | SUI | 2016-02-13 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1930 | 1809 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.34 | 40 | -13.60 | |
| Delmonico, Nils | | | 1930 | SUI | 0.00 | 1 | -0.34 | 40 | -13.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Swiss Team Championship 1.Liga Round 1 | decentralised | SUI | 2016-03-19 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2121 | 1809 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.14 | 40 | -5.60 | |
| Duruz, Noe | | | 2121 | SUI | 0.00 | 1 | -0.14 | 40 | -5.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|