Individual Calculations April 2022
 Rubil, Marko  Total change: 5.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Wiener Vereinsmeisterschaft 2021/22 Landesliga Round 8-9 Vienna AUT 2022-03-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2111 2293 0.00 1 -0.74 20 -14.80 
  Wiedner, Robert 2111 AUT0.001-0.7420-14.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 NOE Landesliga 2021/2022 Round 8-9 several AUT 2022-03-06
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2294 2293 0.00 1 -0.50 20 -10.00 
  Groetz, Harald m2294 AUT0.001-0.5020-10.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 1.Bundesliga AUT 2021/22 Round 5-8 St.Veit an der Glan AUT 2022-03-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2484 2293 2.50 4 1.49 20 29.80 
  Blohberger, Felix g2504 AUT1.0010.772015.40 
  Neugebauer, Martin m2504 SVK0.5010.27205.40 
  Krassowizkij, Jaroslaw m2449 GER1.0010.712014.20 
  Doric, Darko m2478 CRO0.001-0.2620-5.20 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office