Individual Calculations December 2014 |
|
|
Wagner, Stefan Total change: -17.80 | | |
|
Wiener Landesliga 2014/2015 rd 3-4 | Wien | AUT | 2014-11-08 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2141 | 2148 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.51 | 20 | -10.20 | |
| Reimitzer, Wolfgang | | | 2141 | AUT | 0.00 | 1 | -0.51 | 20 | -10.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Noe Landesliga 2014/2015 rd 3-4 | several | AUT | 2014-11-09 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2292 | 2148 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.31 | 20 | -6.20 | |
| Kleiser, Gregor | f | | 2292 | AUT | 0.00 | 1 | -0.31 | 20 | -6.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Wiener Betriebsmeisterschaft A 2014/2015 rd 4-5 | Wien | AUT | 2014-11-12 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2098 | 2148 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.07 | 20 | -1.40 | |
| Stranz, Richard | f | | 2098 | AUT | 0.50 | 1 | -0.07 | 20 | -1.40 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|