Blitz: Individual Calculations January 2015
 Silva, Miguel Antonio Neto  Total change: -4.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 CN Rapidas 2014/2015 Maia POR 2014-12-20
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2077 2213 7.50 11 0.38 20 7.60 
  Lopes, Bruno Ricardo 1813  * POR1.0010.08201.60 
  Ferreira, Joao Pedro Gomes 1813  * POR1.0010.08201.60 
  Tieres, Cristiano 1912 POR1.0010.15203.00 
  Romano, Joao 1813  * POR1.0010.08201.60 
  Aguiar, Henrique Rui Neves 2147 POR1.0010.41208.20 
  Fernandes, Antonio g2320 POR0.5010.15203.00 
  Sousa, Andre Ventura 2089 POR0.501-0.1720-3.40 
  Pires, Emanuel Joao Robarts 2142 POR1.0010.40208.00 
  Ferreira, Jorge Viterbo m2403 POR0.001-0.2520-5.00 
  Martins, David Pires Tavares f2184 POR0.001-0.5420-10.80 
  Santos, Antonio P f2209 POR0.501-0.0120-0.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 CN Rapidas por Equipas 2014/2015 Maia POR 2014-12-20
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1951 2213 1.00 2 -0.59 20 -11.80 
  Pinho, Joaquim Brandao 1813  * POR1.0010.08201.60 
  Sousa, Andre Ventura 2089 POR0.001-0.6720-13.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office