Individual Calculations March 2016 |
|
|
Timmermans, Stefan Total change: 5.80 | | |
|
Limburgse Interclubs 2015-2016 Round 5 Additional | Various | BEL | 2016-01-29 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2037 | 1831 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.26 | 20 | 5.20 | |
| Schenning, Albert | | | 2037 | NED | 0.50 | 1 | 0.26 | 20 | 5.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Limburgse Interclubs 2015-2016 Round 6 | Various | BEL | 2016-02-05 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1770 | 1831 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.08 | 20 | -1.60 | |
| Hendrikx, Marc | | | 1770 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.08 | 20 | -1.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Limburgse Interclubs 2015-2016 Round 7 | Various | BEL | 2016-02-26 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1910 | 1831 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.11 | 20 | 2.20 | |
| Maurissen, Wim | | | 1910 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | 0.11 | 20 | 2.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|