Individual Calculations November 2016 |
|
|
Rousseau, Jean-Francois Total change: -12.60 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 1 | Various places | BEL | 2016-10-02 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1943 | 1879 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.09 | 20 | 1.80 | |
| Seibt, Friedebert | | | 1943 | GER | 0.50 | 1 | 0.09 | 20 | 1.80 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Team 2017 - Nationale 3 r1 | FRANCE | FRA | 2016-10-08 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1800 | 1879 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.61 | 20 | -12.20 | |
| Perard, Pascal | | | 1800 | FRA | 0.00 | 1 | -0.61 | 20 | -12.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 2 | Various places | BEL | 2016-10-16 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1796 | 1879 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.11 | 20 | -2.20 | |
| Keiser, Marc | | | 1796 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.11 | 20 | -2.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|