Individual Calculations January 2017 |
|
|
Pijcke, Benoit Total change: -10.40 | | |
|
Team 2017 - Nationale 4 Part 1 | FRANCE | FRA | 2016-10-08 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1735 | 1746 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.48 | 40 | 19.20 | |
| Vandervorst, Marc | | | 1735 | FRA | 1.00 | 1 | 0.48 | 40 | 19.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 4 | Various places | BEL | 2016-11-27 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1713 | 1752 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.55 | 40 | -22.00 | |
| Vanroose, Sibran | | | 1713 | BEL | 0.00 | 1 | -0.55 | 40 | -22.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 5 | Various places | BEL | 2016-12-04 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2009 | 1758 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.19 | 40 | -7.60 | |
| Grunewald, Leo | | | 2009 | BEL | 0.00 | 1 | -0.19 | 40 | -7.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|