Individual Calculations May 2015 |
|
|
Kolousek, Pavel Total change: 4.40 | | |
|
1. jihoceska divize 2014/2015 r1 | various | CZE | 2014-10-19 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1888 | 1923 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.45 | 40 | 18.00 | |
| Mejta, Frantisek | | | 1888 | CZE | 1.00 | 1 | 0.45 | 40 | 18.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | 1. jihoceska divize 2014/2015 r7-8 | various | CZE | 2015-02-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1886 | 1923 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.05 | 40 | -2.00 | |
| Zikmund, Alexandr | | | 1886 | CZE | 0.50 | 1 | -0.05 | 40 | -2.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | NOTE: K factor changed | 1. jihoceska divize 2014/2015 r11 | various | CZE | 2015-04-12 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1866 | 1923 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.58 | 20 | -11.60 | |
| Marek, Jan | | | 1866 | CZE | 0.00 | 1 | -0.58 | 20 | -11.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|