Individual Calculations September 2014
 Garcia Gimenez, Santiago  Total change: 29.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 IX Torneo De Promocion “B” Almansa ESP 2014-08-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1624 1627 2.00 6 -0.98 40 -39.20 
  Moreno Brocalero, Jorge 1960 ESP0.001-0.1240-4.80 
  Hernandez Sanchez, Rosa 1227  * ESP1.0010.08403.20 
  Piqueras Guardiola, Francisco 1830 ESP0.001-0.2440-9.60 
  Quinonero Padilla, Maria 1482 ESP0.501-0.1940-7.60 
  Khennous, Fares 1857 ALG0.001-0.2140-8.40 
  Paya Leal, Antonio 1390 ESP0.501-0.3040-12.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 VI torneo “ Encrucijada entre dos Reinos”Murcia 22-24 AGOSTO Murcia ESP 2014-08-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1866 1627 3.00 6 1.72 40 68.80 
  Cartagena Sanchez, Javier 1958 ESP0.001-0.1240-4.80 
  Sofiane, Hassab 1793 ESP1.0010.724028.80 
  Guillot Garcia, Antonio 1852 ESP1.0010.784031.20 
  Garcia Ramos, Marcos 2027  * ESP0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Mateos Martinez, Francisco Ramon 1826 ESP0.001-0.2440-9.60 
  Rubio Garcia, Antonio Ramon 1742 ESP1.0010.664026.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office