Rapid: Individual Calculations January 2023
 Korolev, Kirill O.  Total change: 1.90  Rating chartPersonal card
 18 stage of the Moscow Cup 2022 rapid Moscow RUS 2022-11-19
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1752 1691 4.50 9 0.39 38 14.82 
  Selikhov, Ivan 1315 RUS1.0010.09383.42 
  Fominykh, Maria wg2130 RUS0.5010.443816.72 
  Zhuk, Kirill 1734 RUS1.0010.563821.28 
  Israfilov, Ali 2001 RUS0.001-0.1438-5.32 
  Polevoy, David 1606 RUS1.0010.383814.44 
  Zherdev, Radomir 1395 RUS0.001-0.8538-32.30 
  Voronin, Nikita 1638 RUS0.001-0.5738-21.66 
  Saulin, Grigoriy 1693 RUS1.0010.503819.00 
  Uskov, Artem f2255 FID0.001-0.0238-0.76 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Moscow Chmp. Rapid 2022_B17 Moscow RUS 2022-12-02
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1698 1716 4.50 9 -0.34 38 -12.92 
  Tikhomirov, Ivan 1498 RUS1.0010.22388.36 
  Taran, Egor A 1518 RUS1.0010.24389.12 
  Rakitin, Daniil 1872 RUS0.001-0.2938-11.02 
  Amirdzhanyan, Vladimir 2057 RUS0.001-0.1238-4.56 
  Urivskiy, Arseniy A. 1684 RUS0.001-0.5438-20.52 
  Mishin, Matvey 1551 RUS0.501-0.2238-8.36 
  Mishiev, Mikhail 1532 RUS1.0010.26389.88 
  Titarov, Vasilii 2087 RUS0.001-0.1038-3.80 
  Nazarov, Makar 1485 RUS1.0010.21387.98 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office