Individual Calculations February 2017 |
|
|
Nestler, Daniel Total change: 21.20 | | |
|
Luxembourg Team Championship 16/17 Round 4 | various | LUX | 2016-11-20 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2011 | 1822 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.25 | 40 | 10.00 | |
| Goerens, Jean-Paul | | | 2011 | LUX | 0.50 | 1 | 0.25 | 40 | 10.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Luxembourg Team Championship 16/17 Round 5 | various | LUX | 2016-12-11 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1979 | 1828 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.20 | 40 | 8.00 | |
| Corbin, Paul | | | 1979 | LUX | 0.50 | 1 | 0.20 | 40 | 8.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Luxembourg Team Championship 16/17 Round 6 | various | LUX | 2017-01-15 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1883 | 1828 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.08 | 40 | 3.20 | |
| Ludewig, Robert | | | 1883 | LUX | 0.50 | 1 | 0.08 | 40 | 3.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|