Rapid: Individual Calculations November 2016
 Ivanova, Tatiana  Total change: -18.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 Team Russian Championship Seniors_rapid Sochi RUS 2016-10-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2071 2019 3.50 9 -0.36 20 -7.20 
  Saunina, Ludmila wg2065 RUS0.5010.06201.20 
  Mayorova, Lyudmila 2058 RUS0.001-0.4520-9.00 
  Titorenko, Natalia I wm2104 RUS0.001-0.3820-7.60 
  Sazonova, Elena N. wm2165 RUS0.5010.20204.00 
  Bogumil, Tatiana wf2145 RUS0.001-0.3320-6.60 
  Strutinskaia, Galina wg2198 RUS0.001-0.2720-5.40 
  Kalyaeva, Eleonora 1907 RUS1.0010.35207.00 
  Chekhova-Kostina, Tatiana M wm2218 RUS0.5010.26205.20 
  Khalturina, Tatiana 1783 RUS1.0010.20204.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Russian Chess School Challenge Rapid St. Petersburg RUS 2016-10-29
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1927 2019 3.00 6 -0.57 20 -11.40 
  Petrov, Stepan 1619  * RUS1.0010.08201.60 
  Pershin, Denis 2334 RUS0.001-0.1420-2.80 
  Kotsko, Pavel 1619  * RUS1.0010.08201.60 
  Sanarov, Leonid 1965 RUS0.501-0.0820-1.60 
  Saveliev, Alexei 2280 RUS0.001-0.1820-3.60 
  Sazhin, Alexandr 1743 RUS0.501-0.3320-6.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office