Rapid: Individual Calculations March 2017
 Andreev, Viktor  Total change: 50.80  Rating chartPersonal card
 Surgut Cup rapid_2 stage Surgut RUS 2017-02-12
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1800 2026 8.00 9 1.07 20 21.40 
  Tatehin, Yuri 1880 RUS1.0010.30206.00 
  Kononenko, Tatiana 1626  * RUS1.0010.08201.60 
  Cuprik, Grigori 1648 RUS1.0010.09201.80 
  Mekhtiev, Zaur 1674 RUS0.001-0.8920-17.80 
  Lukmanov, Denis 1909 RUS1.0010.34206.80 
  Okunev, Nikolai 1903 RUS1.0010.33206.60 
  Deberchuk, Valery 1807 RUS1.0010.22204.40 
  Kulagin, Vitali 1930 RUS1.0010.37207.40 
  Pasechnik, Sergey 1819 RUS1.0010.23204.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 E.V. Ushakov Cup rapid 2017_2 Surgut RUS 2017-02-19
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1860 2026 7.00 8 1.47 20 29.40 
  Cuprik, Grigori 1648 RUS1.0010.09201.80 
  Krupin, Vladislav 1839 RUS1.0010.26205.20 
  Tangatarov, Timur 2260 RUS0.5010.29205.80 
  Dumakov, Pavel 1869 RUS1.0010.29205.80 
  Levkin, Ivan 1966 RUS1.0010.42208.40 
  Voskresenskaya, Marta 1943 RUS0.501-0.1120-2.20 
  Kutorov, Oleg 1653 RUS1.0010.10202.00 
  Khalturina, Tatiana 1698 RUS1.0010.13202.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office