Individual Calculations September 2011
 Rjabzev, Konstantin  Total change: -10.70  Rating chartPersonal card
 Czech Open 2011 - A - GM open Pardubice CZE 2011-07-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2223 2271 4.00 9 -1.08 10 -10.80 
  Haba, Petr g2504 CZE0.001-0.2110-2.10 
  Klek, Hanna-Marie 2134 GER0.501-0.1810-1.80 
  Kulagin, Sergey 2133 RUS1.0010.31103.10 
  Zpevak, Pavel m2409 CZE0.5010.19101.90 
  Pacher, Milan m2408 SVK0.001-0.3210-3.20 
  Miller, Eduard 2088 GER0.001-0.7410-7.40 
  Zimmermann, Ulrich 2128 GER0.501-0.1910-1.90 
  Pekar, Vaclav 2155 CZE1.0010.34103.40 
  Skacel, Jan 2050 CZE0.501-0.2810-2.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Olomouc Chess Summer 2011 - C - FIDE open Olomouc CZE 2011-08-04
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2087 2271 6.50 9 0.01 10 0.10 
  Reichmann, Pavel 1888 CZE1.0010.09100.90 
  Krupa, Krzysztof c2035 POL1.0010.20102.00 
  Rodmacq, Clement 1978 FRA0.501-0.3510-3.50 
  Truman, Richard G 1991 ENG1.0010.16101.60 
  Janyska, Pavel 2017 CZE1.0010.19101.90 
  Szymanski, Marcin m2410 POL0.001-0.3110-3.10 
  Hobusch, Alexander 2133 GER0.501-0.1910-1.90 
  Karhanek, Pavel 2119 CZE1.0010.30103.00 
  Sikora-Lerch, Jan m2210 CZE0.501-0.0810-0.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office