Rapid: Individual Calculations May 2012
 Gubsky, Egor  Total change: 89.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Cup of Novosibirsk 2012 B Novosibirsk RUS 2012-02-25
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2160 2045 5.00 8 2.24 20 44.80 
  Agafonov, Evgeny 1645  * RUS1.0010.08201.60 
  Chuguev, Anton 2233 RUS0.001-0.2620-5.20 
  Bykov, Mikhail 2199 RUS1.0010.712014.20 
  Kramadzjan, Alexander 2390 RUS0.001-0.1120-2.20 
  Yakushev, Nikolai 2176 RUS1.0010.682013.60 
  Korobkin, Maxim f2317 RUS1.0010.832016.60 
  Kovalev, Evgeny 2188 RUS0.001-0.3120-6.20 
  Shilenko, Vladimir 2130 RUS1.0010.622012.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Novosibirsk Cup-Rapid 2012 - 3 stage Novosibirsk RUS 2012-04-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2116 2045 5.50 8 2.23 20 44.60 
  Serushkov, Vladimir 1719 RUS1.0010.13202.60 
  Pozharsky, Nikolai 2135 RUS0.001-0.3820-7.60 
  Sukhanov, Dmitry 2155 RUS1.0010.652013.00 
  Sidorova, Anna wf2044 RUS1.0010.502010.00 
  Kramadzjan, Alexander 2431 RUS0.5010.41208.20 
  Nikitin, Gennady 2123 RUS0.5010.11202.20 
  Shilenko, Vladimir 2130 RUS1.0010.622012.40 
  Yakushev, Nikolai 2190 RUS0.5010.19203.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office