Individual Calculations February 2017
 Gong, Daniel Hanwen  Total change: 160.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 124th New Zealand Championship Wellington NZL 2017-01-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2059 2090 5.50 8 1.23 40 49.20 
  List, Robert 1690  * NZL1.0010.08403.20 
  Ker, Anthony F m2300 NZL0.001-0.2340-9.20 
  Perry, Roger L 2013 NZL1.0010.394015.60 
  Yee, Stanley 1931 NZL1.0010.294011.60 
  Reilly, Tim f2166 AUS0.5010.10404.00 
  Peng, Shunkai c2021 CHN0.501-0.1040-4.00 
  Rains, Edward c2017 NZL1.0010.404016.00 
  Dale, Ari m2333 AUS0.5010.304012.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 2017 Oceania Zone 3.6 Zonal Championship Auckland NZL 2017-01-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2157 2090 6.50 9 2.78 40 111.20 
  Mukkattu, Philip 1705 NZL1.0010.09403.60 
  Chan, Anthony c1881 AUS0.501-0.2740-10.80 
  Lam, Ross c1883 AUS1.0010.23409.20 
  Hague, Ben f2333 NZL0.5010.304012.00 
  Croad, Nicholas f2278 NZL1.0010.744029.60 
  Kulashko, Alexei f2344 NZL0.5010.314012.40 
  Smith, Robert W f2238 NZL0.5010.20408.00 
  Wastney, Scott f2350 NZL1.0010.824032.80 
  Lane, Gary W m2404 AUS0.5010.364014.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office