Individual Calculations March 2014 |
|
|
Ciornei, Dragos Total change: -3.75 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Rounds 9-10 | Various | BEL | 2014-02-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2099 | 2160 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.08 | 15 | -1.20 | |
| Uhoda, Philippe | | | 2099 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.08 | 15 | -1.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | NRW-Klasse 1 2013/2014 round 6 | Nordrheinwestfalen | GER | 2014-02-02 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2295 | 2160 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.32 | 15 | -4.80 | |
| Maslak, Sulejman | | | 2295 | SRB | 0.00 | 1 | -0.32 | 15 | -4.80 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Dutch Team Competiton 13-14 - 2D - round 5 | Several | NED | 2014-02-08 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1868 | 2160 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.15 | 15 | 2.25 | |
| Auwens, Michel | | | 1868 | NED | 1.00 | 1 | 0.15 | 15 | 2.25 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|