Individual Calculations January 2015 |
|
|
Ciornei, Dragos Total change: 5.40 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2014-2015 Round 5 | Various | BEL | 2014-11-30 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2151 | 2127 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.53 | 20 | 10.60 | |
| Anciaux, Marc | | | 2151 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.53 | 20 | 10.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Dutch Team Competition 2014-2015 - 2D - round 4 | Various | NED | 2014-12-13 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2344 | 2153 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.25 | 20 | 5.00 | |
| Strijbos, Maarten | | | 2344 | NED | 0.50 | 1 | 0.25 | 20 | 5.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | NRW Klasse 1 2014/15 round 4 | Nordrheinwestfalen | GER | 2014-12-14 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2149 | 2153 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.51 | 20 | -10.20 | |
| Berndt, Joachim | | | 2149 | GER | 0.00 | 1 | -0.51 | 20 | -10.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|