Individual Calculations September 2011
 Toepfer, Roland  Total change: 31.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 14.Offene Niedersaechsische Senioren-Einzelmeisterschaft Bad Bevensen GER 2011-07-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1906 1747 4.50 9 1.66 15 24.90 
  Jentsch, Dieter 2147  * GER0.001-0.0815-1.20 
  Ehresmann, Horst 1630 GER1.0010.34155.10 
  Nietsch, Horst 2011 GER1.0010.821512.30 
  Rueckleben, Hermann, Dr. 1989 GER0.001-0.2015-3.00 
  Fritsch, Juergen, Dr. 1957 GER0.001-0.2315-3.45 
  Moeller, Peter, Dr. 1616 GER1.0010.32154.80 
  Peleikis, Horst 2080 GER0.5010.38155.70 
  Fleischer, Martin 1897 GER0.001-0.3015-4.50 
  Briesemeister, Klaus 1829 GER1.0010.61159.15 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Deutscher Senioren-Cup 2010/2011 Gruppe C Bad Blankenburg GER 2011-08-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1939 1747 2.00 6 0.42 15 6.30 
  Kotzem, Ernst 2058 GER0.001-0.1415-2.10 
  Lisowski, Karl 1967 GER1.0010.781511.70 
  Maetzing, Hans-Dieter, Dr. 2056 GER0.5010.36155.40 
  Engelhardt, Erhard 1821 GER0.001-0.4015-6.00 
  Hess, Helmut 1859 GER0.5010.15152.25 
  Walther, Gerd 1872 GER0.001-0.3315-4.95 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office