Individual Calculations September 2022
 Schatz, Christian  Total change: 11.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 CZECH OPEN 2022 - 30 plus - open rating tournament Pardubice CZE 2022-07-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1958 2137 6.50 9 0.03 20 0.60 
  Seele, Hartmut 1759 GER1.0010.09201.80 
  Ni, Polina 1871 LAT0.501-0.3220-6.40 
  Stary, Lukas 1845 CZE1.0010.15203.00 
  Zatko, Gregor 2108 SVK1.0010.46209.20 
  Kastner, Oldrich 2006 CZE0.501-0.1820-3.60 
  Paldus, Petr 1930 CZE0.501-0.2720-5.40 
  Pacl, Vaclav f2036 CZE0.501-0.1420-2.80 
  Novak, Ales 2112 CZE0.501-0.0320-0.60 
  Malinovsky, Petr 1959 CZE1.0010.27205.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 34. Deutsche Senioreneinzelmeisterschaft 2022 over 50 Magdeburg GER 2022-08-12
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2052 2137 6.00 9 0.55 20 11.00 
  Bergstraesser, Andreas 1867 GER1.0010.17203.40 
  Matzat, Andre 1989 GER0.501-0.2020-4.00 
  Kopischke, Maik 1838 GER0.501-0.3520-7.00 
  Heller, Achim 2025 GER0.501-0.1520-3.00 
  Balzer, Lars 2021 GER1.0010.34206.80 
  Raitza, Olaf f2289 GER1.0010.702014.00 
  Hirn, Oskar f2188 GER0.5010.07201.40 
  Lindam, Ingo 2130 GER0.501-0.0120-0.20 
  Brandes, Stephan 2123 GER0.501-0.0220-0.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office