Individual Calculations June 2017 |
|
|
Nemai, Das Total change: -57.60 | | |
|
All India FIDE Rating National Open Chess tmt for Visually Challenged | Begumpeth | IND | 2017-04-26 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1251 | 1237 | 0.00 | 3 | -1.55 | 40 | -62.00 | |
| Patil, Shirish | | | 1637 * | IND | 0.00 | 1 | -0.08 | 40 | -3.20 | | Patel, Lav | | | 1072 | IND | 0.00 | 1 | -0.72 | 40 | -28.80 | | Harish, Sankar Kharat | | | 1045 | IND | 0.00 | 1 | -0.75 | 40 | -30.00 | | * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | All India FIDE Rating National Open Chess Tournament for Visually Challenge | Bokaro | IND | 2017-05-24 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1192 | 1237 | 3.50 | 6 | 0.11 | 40 | 4.40 | |
| Rathi, Himanshi | | | 1018 | IND | 1.00 | 1 | 0.22 | 40 | 8.80 | | Sujit, J Chudasama | | | 1545 | IND | 0.00 | 1 | -0.14 | 40 | -5.60 | | Agesh, Kumar A | | | 1053 | IND | 0.00 | 1 | -0.74 | 40 | -29.60 | | Rajkumar, Bhagat | | | 1065 | IND | 1.00 | 1 | 0.27 | 40 | 10.80 | | Subodh, Rajvanshi | | | 1248 | IND | 0.50 | 1 | 0.02 | 40 | 0.80 | | Aniruddha, Khunte | | | 1223 | IND | 1.00 | 1 | 0.48 | 40 | 19.20 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|