Individual Calculations February 2013
 Puranik, Abhimanyu  Total change: 68.25  Rating chartPersonal card
 Prague Open 2013 - A - IM open Praha CZE 2013-01-09
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2095 2115 5.00 9 0.32 15 4.80 
  Pitkanen, Juhani 1767 FIN1.0010.11151.65 
  Svoboda, Svatopluk f2334 CZE0.001-0.2215-3.30 
  Pastuszko, Kinga 1945 POL1.0010.28154.20 
  Umanec, Filip 2294 CZE0.001-0.2715-4.05 
  Szirmai, Emil 2010 CZE1.0010.36155.40 
  Paulet, Iozefina wg2234 NED0.5010.16152.40 
  Doros, Radu-Marian 2304 ROU0.001-0.2515-3.75 
  Heikkila, Antti 1983 FIN1.0010.32154.80 
  Vykouk, Jan 1987 CZE0.501-0.1715-2.55 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Marienbad Open 2013 - C - FIDE open Marianske Lazne CZE 2013-01-19
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2172 2115 8.00 9 4.23 15 63.45 
  Kuvelkar, Rajaryan 1776 IND1.0010.12151.80 
  Samarin, Leonid 1787 ISR1.0010.13151.95 
  Volodin, Viktor m2200 RUS1.0010.62159.30 
  Dzupin, Dmitry 2211 UKR1.0010.63159.45 
  Novosadova, Kristyna 2158 CZE1.0010.56158.40 
  Mazja, Aleksandr G. m2296 RUS0.5010.24153.60 
  Nguyen, Chi Minh m2401 FRA1.0010.841512.60 
  Kolbus, Dietmar m2302 GER1.0010.741511.10 
  Aguettaz, Maxime m2417 FRA0.5010.35155.25 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office