Rapid: Individual Calculations November 2019
 Couceiro Diaz, Carlos Beade  Total change: 20.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 III Concello de Malpica Malpica ESP 2019-09-28
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1388 1222 3.00 7 0.78 20 15.60 
  Sixto Puente, Eloy 1622  * ESP0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Fuentes Barreiro, Juan Carlos 1432 ESP1.0010.772015.40 
  Vazquez Gomez, Marcos 1610 ESP0.001-0.0920-1.80 
  Lema Garcia, Ramiro 1488 ESP0.001-0.1820-3.60 
  Herrador Segade, Hugo 1077 ESP1.0010.31206.20 
  Cernadas Camean, David 1462 ESP0.001-0.2020-4.00 
  Lourido Lineiro, Cristian 1027 ESP1.0010.25205.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 III Concello de Zas Baio ESP 2019-10-12
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1411 1222 2.00 6 0.23 20 4.60 
  Lopez Gonzalez, Alfonso 1622  * ESP0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Creo Abeijon, Diego 1520 ESP0.5010.35207.00 
  Souto Eiroa, Jacinto 1009 ESP1.0010.23204.60 
  Teijeira Lastres, Rodrigo 1622  * ESP0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Vilacoba Casal, Sergio 1232 ESP0.5010.01200.20 
  Diaz Garcia, Juan Manuel 1460 ESP0.001-0.2020-4.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office