Individual Calculations July 2008
 Bauer, Peter  Total change: 18.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 HUN Team Ch. NB-II Erkel Hungary HUN 2007-10-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2211 2137 4.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 
  Vereb, Gabor 2186 HUN1.0010.57158.55 
  Jacso, Adam 2169 HUN0.5010.04150.60 
  Repasi, Zoltan 2144 HUN0.5010.01150.15 
  Varga, Laszlo 2194 HUN0.5010.08151.20 
  Vrona, Mihail 2119 HUN0.501-0.0315-0.45 
  Ondok, Laszlo 2248 HUN0.001-0.3515-5.25 
  Sinka, Istvan f2326 HUN0.5010.25153.75 
  Tabor, Jozsef m2249 HUN0.001-0.3515-5.25 
  Bodrogi, Mihaly 2199 HUN0.001-0.4115-6.15 
  Szell, Lajos f2280 HUN0.5010.19152.85 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Budapest Team Ch. 1/A Div. Budapest HUN 2007-10-21
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2116 2137 6.50 10 1.20 15 18.00 
  Molnar, Jozsef 2169 HUN1.0010.54158.10 
  Sugar, Karoly 2151 HUN0.5010.02150.30 
  Pallagi, Janos 2093 HUN0.501-0.0615-0.90 
  Kormos, Adam 2144 HUN0.5010.01150.15 
  Kiss, Akos 2068 HUN1.0010.40156.00 
  Farkas, Lajos 2157 HUN0.5010.03150.45 
  Pal, Mihaly 2030 HUN1.0010.35155.25 
  Csapo, Zoltan f2117 HUN0.501-0.0315-0.45 
  Lukacs, Daniel 2067 HUN0.501-0.1015-1.50 
  Kovacs, Gabor 2167 HUN0.5010.04150.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office